Что думаешь? Оцени!
中国平煤神马集团强化科技创新主体地位，建机制、搭平台、育人才，新质生产力培育成效显著。
，更多细节参见黑料
The lesson, I believe, is that the Palsgraf principle is unsound: One need not act wrongfully toward another — need not mistreat her, as opposed to other people — to incur a liability in morality or law to compensate her for the injuries one has inflicted on her. If that lesson is correct, however, what should we make of the black-letter proposition, which is embraced by most common law jurisdictions, that the duty of care in negligence is owed only to foreseeable victims, such that only foreseeable victims can in ordinary cases recover?144 In my view, this black-letter rule does not reflect any principled commitment to the significance of relational wrongdoing in grounding negligence liability (a commitment that would sit in stark tension with the underlying moral commitments of transferred-intent doctrine). There is, rather, a more complex moral principle operating beneath the surface of both doctrinal areas — a principle that explains why unforeseeable transferred intent victims can recover, and why unforeseeable victims of mere negligence (as in Palsgraf) typically cannot.
#5. Don’t always default to chatObviously, chat is the de-facto UI paradigm for LLMs and generative AI. However, in our RCA case, it would be silly to force a user to go to some chat UI and asked Rocky “please analyse this failing check”. We can ask that question for the user, even when they are sleeping and just ship the initial analysis to their inbox. Chat can be a follow up.
duplicated: [2, 3, 4, 5, 6]