Что думаешь? Оцени!
d00755 0 0 0 /sys
。立即前往 WhatsApp 網頁版对此有专业解读
Go to worldnews，推荐阅读手游获取更多信息
There’s a part of this I haven’t seen anyone say out loud. When the person opening the PR gets credit for shipping and the reviewer bears the consequences of reviewing a bad merge, you have a structural problem no tool can solve. That incentive gap widens when the contributor isn’t an engineer building context over time. A PM using an AI coding tool isn’t on a path to owning the service. Unlike a junior engineer who gradually needs less oversight, they’ll need review for every change they make, indefinitely, because they’re not building the kind of context that earns independence. So that review load doesn’t taper but remains a permanent line item, and most teams aren’t planning for it that way.，推荐阅读超级权重获取更多信息